16 bit black and white tiff in on1 photo raw

#16 BIT BLACK AND WHITE TIFF IN ON1 PHOTO RAW PRO#
#16 BIT BLACK AND WHITE TIFF IN ON1 PHOTO RAW DOWNLOAD#

Time is often critical, and seconds can make a difference in getting in under deadline or getting the picture out first among competing agencies. They shoot dual cards and simply plug one into a computer.

I often saw guys and gals frantically indexing and sending images from the field during events with special modems to transmit images directly from their computers.

#16 BIT BLACK AND WHITE TIFF IN ON1 PHOTO RAW PRO#

Having worked alongside pro stills guys in Asia for decades, I have to say that it is not true that one often has time to process raws. I haven't shot a jpeg for work in several years and don't expect to ever have to again.Unlike Reuters most media still allow their photog. In addition, when there is te and you don't have to send an email most newspapers still would rather have a tiff file, so usually there is no downside to shooting raw but there is a huge upside. I haven't shot a jpeg for work in several years and don't expect to ever have to again. It only takes another 30 seconds to process the photo. Then you need to sort them to find the photo you are going to send.

#16 BIT BLACK AND WHITE TIFF IN ON1 PHOTO RAW DOWNLOAD#

You still have to download photos to a computer, in most cases, in order to send them to the media outlet. It is very rare to not have time to process a raw photo. Unlike Reuters most media still allow their photographers to shoot in raw. Of course the likelihood of me producing a masterpiece with my DSLR is also pretty small, but I shoot raw just in case.Jpg is what you want if you NEED instant use of yo. There are ways to shoot raw with my iPhone, but I don't use them because I don't try to produce masterpieces with my phone. For social media I use my old iPhone, which produces photos that are not wall hangers, but are acceptable as momentary messages. You post it and it's forgotten tomorrow, for the most part. Journalism frequently needs instant jpgs, but social media is probably where most of the instant jpgs go. Jpg is what you want if you NEED instant use of your photo. Standardizing on an incomplete solution that may not work for all situations is not as good. So standardizing on a complete solution that works 100% of the time has its benefits. From the standpoint of results, raw serves up 100% of what you can get out of an image, and jpeg varies from 100% to zero, as I demonstrated in my pictures of the sky after a storm, where no jpeg worked, despite bracketing. The advantage of shooting raw all the time is that there is zero chance you will be using jpeg when you really wanted raw. Working in ProPhoto makes no sense if you start with a jpeg. Even with subjects of average contrast you may find better dynamic range, detail retention and smoother color and tone gradation when you shoot raw, process in a large color space like ProPhoto in 16 bit, and convert to jpeg. The answer to your question will be the same one I provided. To understand why, you'll need to shoot raw only for a while. Even though I suspect you meant 'convert it to jpeg' not raw. If you shoot raw and process the file using all the information the raw file provide, then convert it to raw so you can post it on UHH, doesn't that discard the benefits of processing a raw file?

16 bit black and white tiff in on1 photo raw